Slutwalks and Such: Who’s Making Women’s History Today?

by Catherine Engh on April 2nd, 2012
in 9 Ways Blog, Create a Movement, Gender, Leadership, Power Tools and tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Big thanks and kudos to Catherine Engh for contributing some terrific posts this Women’s History Month. As we end WHM for 2012, here’s one more from Catherine that I know you’ll enjoy, and I hope you’ll think about and take a moment to share your comments. I’ve written a different take on Slutwalk but Catherine has almost persuaded me…

This last year, women around the world made history, protesting victim-blaming online as well as on foot. The Slutwalk movement began after a Toronto police officer told a group of college women that if they hoped to escape sexual assault, they should avoid dressing like “sluts.”

Victim-blaming last year was by no means isolated to this public incident. A young woman who pressed rape charges against two New York City police officers could not be believed, in part, because she was drunk. When an 11-year-old Texas girl was allegedly gang-raped by 19 men, The New York Times ran a story quoting neighbors saying that she habitually wore makeup and dressed in clothes more appropriate for a 20-year-old. The maid who accused Dominique Strauss-Kahn of rape has been discredited for being a liar, and The New York Post claimed she was a prostitute.

The women and men who marched in Slutwalks in more than 70 cities around the world last year were fed up with this kind of symbolic violence. The Slutwalk movement was organized around one central message: the relentless interrogation of women’s characters and narratives after they have been raped is deeply problematic and not to be tolerated. Whether wearing a bikini or a power suit, women and their stories are to be respected, not subject to demeaning scrutiny based upon their performance of gender or sexuality.
The movement drew a mixed response from the feminist blogosphere. As protesters donned bras, halter tops and garter belts, feminists worried that the women’s physical embodiment of the term ‘slut’ re-produced the oppressive stereotypes (virgin/whore binary) that operated to control their narratives, bodies and experiences in the first place. Did these women’s reclamation of the slur obscure the root of the issue—victim blaming? Some saw the provocative term and accompanying spectacle as a necessary and effective way of garnering widespread public attention. Others worried about exclusion, noting that certain cultures that value ‘public dignity’ would be unable to participate. Some feminists of color pointed out that the term slut is predominately used to denote white women, while black women are called hoes. Thus, the most marginalized, those who are most susceptible to public shaming in our culture, were not spoken for by the movement.

Considering SlutWalks in relation to women’s History, I couldn’t help but draw a few parallels to the Taking Back the Night marches of 1970s second wave feminism. Both Slutwalks and Take Back the Night have taken up the issue of violence against women’s bodies with mixed responses from the feminist community.

Take back the Night first appeared in the Unites States in 1975 when citizens of Philadelphia rallied together after the murder of young microbiologist, Susan Alexander Speeth, who was stabbed by a stranger a block from her home while walking alone. Three years later, Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media used the slogan to organize a march through the red-light district of San Francisco in protest of rape and pornography, which they identified with the sexualized subordination of women. At this same time, women around the world were taking up the issue of sexual violence, locally organizing marches, most notably in Belgium, West Germany, Leeds and Rome.

Radical Feminist Andrea Dworkin spoke at the march in San Francisco, pointing out that, at night, women are forced to choose between confinement and danger. She urged women to fight for their freedom to move without fear in public space. As the movement sought to raise public awareness about the ways that violence permeates the lives and bodies of women around the world, Dworkin’s radical anti-pornography feminism marked a divide that was to splinter the feminist movement.

Radical feminists such as Dworkin and Susan Brownmiller saw pornography as violently re-capitulating a culture in which women’s bodies are objectified, in which they exist solely as objects of male desire. Other feminists saw the limitations to a logic in which all feminist analysis was reduced to conceptualizations of female sexuality as always Other, always oppressed, and ultimately without existence.

Take Back the Night events have continued on college campuses to this day. The women-only policies have caused controversy on some campuses; activists arguing that male allies and sexual assault survivors should be allowed to march in support of women. In response, events have evolved on some campuses. At Wesleyan University, men as well as women are given the opportunity to speak up about their experiences of sexual assault.

Take Back the Night and SlutWalks have bravely sought to communicate their respective messages through grassroots organization, fighting symbolic and manifest violence enacted on women’s bodies by cultures infused with mysogyny. While critics found the execution and language of Slutwalks to be problematic and Take Back the Night’s insistence on patriarchal sexual domination limiting, both movements certainly stirred up the public conversation and got us thinking about how to best conceive of a feminist politics that accommodates for difference.

So at the end of Women’s History Month, I would like to express gratitude to all those fearless women who have taken to the streets to combat social policing of gender and sexuality. I would also like to acknowledge the value of smart dissent. The opinions of those who have been outspoken about their problems with these movements are invaluable, whether they took issue with exclusion or the problematics of a universalizing feminism. As the organizers of SlutWalks NYC say on their website, “We cannot forget our past mistakes. If we do, we’ll never be better feminists; that’s what we want more than anything.” Feminist activism, analysis and organization can only benefit from the action of all those who marched, organized and took their stand.

Catherine Engh

Catherine Engh is a feminist and an aspiring writer particularly interested in the ways that girls and women are represented in fiction and television. Catherine also likes to do as much yoga as is possible—perhaps she’ll write about that next
Share

5 Responses to Slutwalks and Such: Who’s Making Women’s History Today?

  1. Aletha says:

    Other feminists saw the limitations to a logic in which all feminist analysis was reduced to conceptualizations of female sexuality as always Other, always oppressed, and ultimately without existence.

    I am sorry to have to say, this is a straw man argument. That is not what that divide was all about. It is, however, part of the distorting lens that enables the apologists for pornography to call opponents of pornography sex-negative. My point is that pornography has nothing to do with female sexuality, since pornography, as opposed to erotica, is all about reducing women to the objects of male desire. To be a sex object and/or mother has been seen as the proper traditional role of women in most cultures, so sex could be conceived as a wifely duty. Female sexuality is incompatible with this concept, but pornography fits right in, reinforcing it.

  2. Catherine says:

    Thanks for your comment Aletha. I should have clarified. When I say female sexuality is reduced to the Other, I meant to highlight the way that anti-pornography feminists saw pornography as re-enforcing a misogynist culture within which women are not permitted to be the subject of their own desires. In such an analysis, the axis’ of sexual and gender oppression are interchangeable and sexuality is implicitly gendered male.

    Feminists such as Gayle Rubin sought to create separate theories of gender and sexuality. She criticized cultural notions of ‘normative’ sex acts and was interested in creating a theory wherein diverse sexual practices could be tolerated. Moving beyond the good/bad binary in relation to pornography and ‘deviant’ sexuality, she created a space wherein women could take pleasure in various types of sex acts.

    This is not to say that the commercial sex industry doesn’t reflect sexism and re-enforce traditional roles of women that exist within society as a whole. What is needed is an analysis of gender stratifications within pornography rather than demonization of commercial sex industry as a whole.

    My point is not that all opponents of pornography are sex-negative. Rather, my point is that feminists critical of the anti-pornography movement de-emphasized the significance of pornography as re-enforcing gender hierarchies, and instead emphasized the possibilities of a theory of sexuality which moved beyond the binaries of good/bad sexuality.

  3. Aletha says:

    Thank you for the clarification. Though I am interested in feminist theory, and have developed a feminist political philosophy with some friends myself, I am not an academic or professional writer. I consider traditional notions of gender and normative sexuality oppressive artificial constructs designed to subordinate women. My comment is based on my dealings with the topic of pornography in the feminist blogosphere, where I have encountered feminists who think feminists have no business criticizing any form of non-coerced pornography, because women who participate are freely making a choice to do so; who recognize no distinction between feminist and religious fanatical criticisms of pornography, and snicker at feminist attempts to draw a distinction between erotica and pornography; who therefore deem all opponents of pornography sex-negative prudes who are trying to send women back to the Dark Ages. If you think I am exaggerating, I could post links to entries on the Ms. Magazine blog where I debated with such “feminists.” I gave up posting on that blog because the moderators censored me one too many times. I was not the only one they censored, and I could understand their difficulties in trying to keep on lid on the acrimony, but I got sick of having to walk a tightrope to avoid being censored.

  4. Pingback: Why Women in Leadership Must Change Our Narrative

  5. Pingback: Take The Lead » Why Women Must Change Our Narrative to Break Through to Leadership Parity

 
Footer line
Copyright 2010 Gloria Feldt